https://www.iotworldtoday.com/wp-content/themes/ioti_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
    • Back
    • IoT World 2020 News
  • Strategy
  • Special Reports
  • Galleries
  • Business Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Industry Perspectives
    • Featured Vendors
  • Other Content
    • Back
    • IoT World 2020 News
    • Q&As
    • Case Studies
    • Features
    • How-to
    • Opinion
    • Video / Podcasts
  • More
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Strategic Partners
  • IOT World Events
    • Back
    • Internet of Things World: San Jose
    • IoT World 2020 News
Iot World Today
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
    • Back
    • IoT World 2020 News
  • Strategy
  • Special Reports
  • Galleries
  • Business Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Industry Perspectives
    • Featured Vendors
  • Other Content
    • Back
    • IoT World 2020 News
    • Q&As
    • Case Studies
    • Features
    • How-to
    • Opinion
    • Video / Podcasts
  • More
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Strategic Partners
  • IOT World Events
    • Back
    • Internet of Things World: San Jose
    • IoT World 2020 News
  • newsletter
  • IIoT
  • Cities
  • Energy
  • Homes/Buildings
  • Transportation/Logistics
  • Connected Health Care
  • Retail
  • AI
  • Architecture
  • Engineering/Development
  • Security
ioti.com

Security


Thinkstock

Stock volatility

IoT Cybersecurity Problems Could Increase Stock Volatility

Public companies with lax IoT cybersecurity could potentially attract the ire of investors and government authorities.
  • Written by Brian Buntz
  • 10th May 2018

Last month, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission fined Altaba, the company formerly known as Yahoo, $35 million for withholding a 2014 breach involving some 500 million user accounts for two years. The action marked the first time the regulator punished a company for its failure to disclose a cyber breach with the public. In related news, the Federal Trade Commission reached a settlement with Uber for attempting to hide a data breach involving 57 million users. The ride-sharing company went so far as to pay $100,000 to the hackers behind the breach before disclosing it a year after the event happened. If Uber attempts to pull similar stunts, FTC could hit the company with civil penalties.

[Internet of Things World addresses the security concerns for IoT implementation in every vertical, attracting senior security professionals from the world’s biggest organizations. Get your tickets and free expo passes now.]

From an Internet of Things perspective, SEC’s decision to fine Altaba and FTC’s heightened scrutiny of Uber could spell trouble for companies with lax IoT cybersecurity practices. For one thing, the Internet of Things opens up new possibilities for hacks involving personally identifiable information. But, in some case, it also give hackers the ability to directly attack companies’ core business processes, adding a new dimensions to cyberthreats.

“Public companies can use IoT in several categories which could affect overall security considerations — both in the physical and cyber realms,” said Peter Tran, vice president, head of global cyber defense and security strategy at Worldpay. Companies deploying unsecured IoT technology for supply chain and production applications have an especially acute risk, as cybercriminals could, at least theoretically, attack those systems to sabotage their business or cause safety incidents. Imagine what might happen, for instance, to public confidence in an electric power holding company or oil-and-gas company if a rival nation-state was able to take control over their connected equipment. Hacked industrial machines could malfunction and hurt workers in some cases. Cybercriminals could silence smoke alarms or take a connected online sensor designed to detect a flammable gas offline.

Companies that take a lackadaisical approach to IoT cybersecurity for consumer authentication controls and interactions could also see their stock plummet in the wake of a high profile attack. “If the public company’s main consumer products are IoT-driven at their core, those products can create sub-attack vectors and blind spots,” Tran said. “This can significantly skew the risk quotient in any number of directions and that creates volatility.”

In February, the SEC issued updated cybersecurity guidance advising public companies to “inform investors about material cybersecurity risks and incidents in a timely fashion,” including companies with a substantial cybersecurity risk that have not yet been a victim of a cyberattack.

“It absolutely makes sense that investors should have information on a company’s cybersecurity stance before investing in them,” said Don DeLoach, president and chief operating officer of cybersecurity firm CENTRI. “There are broader implications in how you measure a company than just their balance sheet, profitability and all of that.” When doing due diligence on such firms, it would be logical to evaluate both their internal IoT cybersecurity maturity, as well as that of their partner base. “Think of the value of a public company being like the value of a home. That value is affected by what is inside the lot line but also what is around it. If my neighbor decides to have bonfires in their front yard every night or paint their house purple, that could have an adverse effect on the value of my home.”

It is clear the same principle applies to businesses — whether public companies hoping to inspire confidence in investors or startups looking for the next funding round or planning an IPO.

But information on cybersecurity can be hard to come by. But companies have a vested interest in avoiding over-disclosure of cybersecurity details, as it could also assist cybercriminals and nation-state actors engaging in cyberespionage.

While such attacks are mostly theoretical at this point, any such tragedy could significantly affect the stock valuation of any public companies that are involved, and the risks are already substantial. A 2018 survey from the Ponemon Institute underwritten by Raytheon found that 80 percent of the security professionals surveyed thought an IoT-related data breach could be catastrophic for their organization, while two-thirds agreed that would “seriously diminish their organization’s shareholder value.”

Even hackers who did nothing but modify IoT data or sound false alarms could sow substantial chaos. Consider that, in 2004, a man pretending to be a Dow spokesperson on the BBC World News program falsely stated that the company planned to give billions of dollars to the surviving victims of the 1984 Bhopal disaster. The stunt caused Dow Chemical’s stock to drop 4.24 percent in 23 minutes, erasing $2 billion of its market valuation.

Even affecting the availability of central business networks can cause substantial damages. From 2011 to 2013, Iranian hackers targeted dozens of U.S. banks and succeeded in crashing the websites of several of them. According to a federal indictment, the attack induced millions of dollars worth of damages.

Ultimately, the problem of IoT cybersecurity may seem novel in many ways, but it is just another business risk to manage. Tran advocates the refining tools used to gauge current market volatility such as the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Volatility Index so they also analyze cyberrisk. By leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning, such a system could, in theory, “analyze large amounts of cybersecurity risk factor data such as a company’s perimeter, network and endpoint security data, internal and external internet traffic behavioral patterns and open source attacker reconnaissance indicators,” Tran said. The system could then provide a blended risk index or a stand-alone security risk index to chart relative breach exposure. Tran concluded: “This approach could solve the ‘lightning rod’ concerns for companies and allow regulators more teeth for disclosure requirements to protect investors.”

Tags: Article Security Technologies News

Related


  • Image shows CCTV security camera monitoring on street.
    Verkada Security Camera Hack Hits Telsa; Cloudflare
    A cloud-based security camera firm was hit with a massive hack. Experts have likened the breach to the recent SolarWinds security event.
  • IoT security
    Zero-Trust Security for IoT: Establishing Rigorous Device Defenses
    IoT security pros can benefit from zero-trust security to authenticate rogue devices that try to connect to a network. Zero trust should be the hallmark of your IoT strategy.
  • 3d rendering of human brain on technology background
    AI Ups the Ante for IoT Cybersecurity
    Security providers in IT and OT have implemented AI, ML and other advanced technologies to make systems smarter than malicious attackers.
  • IoT security
    Protecting Your Network Against Ripple20 Vulnerabilities
    Early this year, Ripple20 wrought havoc on numerous IoT devices, given vulnerable third-party code. Here are ways to prevent your organization from the fallout.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your IoT World Today account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Content

  • LynxSecure Datasheet
  • LYNX MOSA.ic™ Avionic Platform (Advantage w/ Intel)
  • COVID-19 Driving Data Integration Projects in IoT
  • Intro to LynxSecure

News

View all

Webex Collaboration Banks on Hybrid Workplace Model at Cisco Live 2021

2nd April 2021

Cisco Enlists Networking Automation, CX Cloud in COVID-19 Response

31st March 2021

White Papers

View all

Telehealth and COVID Infographic

30th March 2021

Medical Supply Chain Management with Smart Devices and Sensors

30th March 2021

Special Reports

View all

Cybersecurity Protection Increasingly Depends on Machine Learning

28th October 2020

Webinars

View all

Real-Time Analysis of Driver Behavior Using Machine Learning

13th May 2021

Weber’s Journey: How a Top Grill Maker Serves Up Connected Cooking

25th February 2021

Galleries

View all

Top IoT Trends to Watch in 2020

26th January 2020

Five of the Most Promising Digital Health Technologies

14th January 2020

Industry Perspectives

View all

IoT Spending Holds Firm — Tempered by Dose of ‘IoT Pragmatism’

1st December 2020

The Great IoT Connectivity Lockdown

11th May 2020

Events

View all

Embedded IoT World 2021

28th April 2021 - 29th April 2021

The Virtual Industrial AI Summit

29th June 2021 - 30th June 2021

IoT World 2021

2nd November 2021 - 4th November 2021

Twitter

IoTWorldToday, IoTWorldSeries

How Smart Environments Will Take Shape Post-COVID-19 dlvr.it/RxfPG2 https://t.co/Y6DMWxZf9S

14th April 2021
IoTWorldToday, IoTWorldSeries

IoT Enterprise Deployments Continue Apace, Despite COVID-19 dlvr.it/RxWwsS https://t.co/BSkxdf17vs

12th April 2021
IoTWorldToday, IoTWorldSeries

🥳Happy #IoTDay! How are you celebrating? We're giving $50 off All Access Passes to join our upcoming virtual event,… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

9th April 2021
IoTWorldToday, IoTWorldSeries

🎉 Announcing #EIOTWORLD sponsor, @InnoPhaseinc — a fabless wireless semiconductor platform company specializing in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

8th April 2021

Newsletter

Sign up for IoT World Today newsletters: vertical industry coverage on Tuesdays and horizontal tech coverage on Thursdays.

Special Reports

Our Special Reports take an in-depth look at key topics within the IoT space. Download our latest reports.

Business Resources

Find the latest white papers and other resources from selected vendors.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IoT World Series
  • Channel Futures
  • RISC-V
  • Dark Reading
  • ITPro Today
  • Web Hosting Talk

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Login/Register

FOLLOW IoT World Today ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X